Australian Daybill Posters Not Appearing On Presskits.
If an Australian presskit doesn't show a daybill as part of the types of posters available for exhibitors to purchase would one then believe there wasn't one printed ? I am talking 1940s here and not 1980s or later when this probably started to happen. I would appreciate any thoughts on this question I have posed ?
0
Comments
Here is a handy checklist to help tell eMoviePoster.com apart from all other major auctions!
I will as soon as I sort out a technical problem I am having at present.
One thing is clear, the artist (one can assume the printer) is a different one on the Daybill to the ones in the presskit.
One can speculate but as the presskit was printed by Market Print, I assume they printed the posters on the presskit, perhaps the Daybill when printed by the other printer they provided an insert for the presskit.
There are two other pages but there appears only the one dealing with posters.
W.E.Smith printed the daybill and The Market Printery the presskit and in passing Offset most likely printed the one sheet. The printing was certainly spread around.
The including of a copy of the daybill in the presskit would have been an expensive exercise and personally I doubt that this would have happened,
I think the daybill hadn't yet been printed when the presskit was being printed and a note to this affect to explain the situation was left off the kit and the daybill was sold sight unseen in this case. An earlier case of a Paramount presskit without a daybill image is when the presskit was printed the daybill and six sheets weren't ready for reproduction onto the presskit so a notation to this affect was included in the presskit. I will find the example and post it later. The exclusion of a notation similar to one I have just mentioned I believe was just an oversight made by the printer when printing the Blaze Of Noon presskit by not including an explanation regarding the missing daybill.