Skip to content

We want it scary...but not TOO scary!

1246710

Comments

  •                                                                                                                                                                                      Just to show how the Australian film censors policy with knives. axes and sissors was inconsistent here is an allowed pair of scissors for the film Blond Ice from 1948. Looking a little closer into this matter the on and off censoring of knives, axes, scissors, blow torches  etc appears to have started to take place in the late 1950s. Again I must state as far as I can see gun images were exempt from censorship. There is a question mark surrounding Lady In The Lake but I now believe this wasn't a censorship matter but an intentional artistic daybill design change.
  •                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   To further support my case that Australian censors didn't have any problems with guns and they didn't disallow a  pointing gun in Robert Momtgomery's hand in Lady In The Lake I have posted an image from another daybill image from 1947 the same year of release. The Invisible Wall shows a gun being held at a man's head which was more likely to have been censored than the gun that was originally held in Robert Montgomery's hand on the U.S. posters. As previously stated I believe the pointing finger was an artistic decision to point at the person viewing the poster.
  •                                                                                                                                                                                         Justine ( 1969 ). A knife allowed and a pretty scary one at that. Regarding Australian censorship on knives it is hard to understand their logic back then.

  • edited November 2015
     On the 29th of September of this year I posted the above daybill image of the 1958 film The Hot Angel and spoke of my surprise in the allowing by the Australian censor of the knife threatening image to be used on the poster. I have just noticed the same image on the Australian one sheet has had the blade of the switchblade removed. The complete  one sheet image wasn't used as it was very dark in appearance and the enlarged section I have included shows the point I am making in better light. The daybill allowed but the same image on the one sheer censored so someone explain this one to me? 
  • edited November 2015
    HONDO said:

    Here is a question for someone to answer. This would be unusual but are there any examples where a threatening knife being held in a persons hand appears on an Australian daybill but the knife image doesn't appear at all on the U.S. insert or other posters of the same title? 

    Halloween - US posters don't show a person, just the knife. 
  • it's obvious that the censors don't want you fragile folks down under to shit your pants....
  • Rich said:
    it's obvious that the censors don't want you fragile folks down under to shit your pants....
    Yep, that's it...

     <<<Aussie VS USA>>> 

  • Coming soon is a axe wielding rodent but was never in Australia or America.

  • HONDO said:

    Coming soon is a axe wielding rodent but was never in Australia or America.


    now I'm curious... :pensive:
  • That was my intention.

  • HONDO said:

    Coming soon is a axe wielding rodent but was never in Australia or America.


    Anyone have an ideas ?
  • Not a clue!
  • Pancho said:
    Not a clue!

    Good.
  • How about...


  • That's gotta be it, David!
  • Doesn't look very threatening. You'll have to do better than that..

  • Now you scared me.
  • This may turn out to be an explosive thread also.
  • edited November 2015
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      A clue.
  • nope, Rat Axe remains my best attempt
  •                                                                                                                                                                                              Image 1 - Australia

        Image 2 - Australia

        Image 3 - Argentina

        Image 4 - Yugoslavia

        Image 5 - France

        Image 6 - Italy                                                                                                                                              

    In Australia and the U.S.A. posters featuring a friendly Tom And Jerry seemed to present to us an amicable relationship happening between Tom and Jerry similar to image 1 which is probably from the 1950s but may be 1940s. Image 2 from the 1970s  with a wink done tongue in cheek regarding the violence to follow and this is it seems as far as any confrontation between the two was usually depicted in Australia. In the U.S. the majority of posters were free of intended violence between the two but there were a few with minor intended violent depicted but with nothing like some of images that appeared on some foreign posters. The remaining four images from foreign countries presents mainly a cranky savage looking Tom hell bent in causing maximum damage to Jerry not only using an axe but also an iron, dynamite , traps. a pistol and even Tom holding  Jerry between a sandwich. Interestingly the Argentinean and Yugoslavian poster depict a combination of violence with song and dance and happiness on the same posters but with the French and Italian posters they decided to go for 100% violence.




















  •                                                                    The 1970s with the introduction of the R certificate certainly changed the guidelines to how the censors looked at each film coming into Australia and the approach to the way advertising material was reviewed and sometimes censored and altered from the original material provided to them. By the start of the 1980s film poster images which in no way would have been allowed the 1970s and before began to be allowed for public exhibition and two of the more graphic examples cleared by the Australian censor in 1972 are shown above..

  • edited January 2016
                                                                                                                     Seconds ( 1966 ). Australian daybill and heavily censored New Zealand version on the daybill used for its release there.
  • Um, I'm a bit speechless with that NZ poster!
  • Seconds is hilarious. Those Kiwis sure were a nervous lot
  • Another knife removal. Again another really obvious one that makes the poster look a little silly!




  • Missing knives - and...um...two missing mutants:

    k693 MUTATIONS Australian daybill movie poster 74 Donald Pleasence a608 MUTATIONS insert movie poster 74 Donald Pleasence sci-fi
  • edited March 2016
      The Outrage ( 1964 ). Left is the original U.S. Insert and on the right the Australian, and in this case New Zealand distributed, daybill.
  • HONDO said:
      The Outrage ( 1964 ). Left is the original U.S. Insert and on the right the Australian, and in this case New Zealand distributed, daybill.
    From strangling to kinda sensual...
Sign In or Register to comment.






Logo

For movie poster collectors who know...

@ 2025 Vintage Movie Posters Forum, All rights reserved.

Contact us

info@vintagemoviepostersforum.com

Get In Touch