Paperback vs. Linenback
So I am in a debate on facebook about what are standard backing procedures: regarding paperback vs. linenback.
My understanding is that almost all one sheet sized posters are linenbacked and that if a restorer is capable of completing both procedures (paperbacking and linenbacking), that inserts, half sheet, window cards, and lobby cards are paperbacked.
I have also assumed from my experiences, that paperbacking is the preferred method for card stock items due to the thickness and rigidity of the original materials.
However some inserts/half sheets are on very thin card stock and could easily accept both procedures.
But, when considering the thicker card stocks, my fear would be that, if linenbacked, and rolled the previously addressed creases would return to some degree. Versus a flat paperbacked effort.
Other than this assumption, does anyone have definitive answers why card stock items are paperbacked vs. linenbacked?
My other assumption is that there isn't a lot of information on paperbacking and many restorers aren't comfortable or knowledgable on it. So it is simply easier to sell linenbacking for these items.
Thoughts?
0

Comments
TRUE paperbacking (the kind museums do) is just backing the item onto a lightweight rice paper (to hold it together) and then missing areas ("voids") are carefully filled without painting over areas that are there.
Done well, this is fantastic, but the result is a poster that has to be handled carefully and can be ripped or torn or creased.
The poster world kind of "paperbacking" would better be called "boardbacking". There is nothing wrong with it, but it involves a MUCH higher degree of restoration than the above method of paperbacking.
I certainly have seen more backed movie posters than just about anyone in the world! Ask specific questions and I will try to answer them.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
I believe I read somewhere that to linenback a Window Card would cause the linen to become wavy and buckle because it is lighter weight than the WC. Is this true? Has anyone tried or has a WC that is linenbacked?
I am new to this, but want to conserve and support two WC's that I have and not sure if they can be backed on canvas...Thanks!
Thanks! What purpose does the holytex serve? Does it get peeled off after it has dried? I think I remember from your thread when you paperbacked an Insert you use holytex...should I get a heavier masa? So masa is always the neutral barrier between the poster & the paper/holytex?
I'm gonna need some help here on an issue.
I have recently purchased a 'The Sting' poster but it was in very bad shape (tears, pinholes, tape,...) And I've been looking for someone in Belgium to restore this beauty.
Now, I have found someone that says he can fully restore the poster and also paperback it if I wanted to (he says he doesn't do linen backing).
Now, I've read on the internet that usually 1 sheets are linen backed and not paper backed (also, you can't roll the paper backed posters.)
Is that true? So should I get it paper backed or just restored?
The guy seems to know what he's talking about because he fixes everything...
Thanks 4 the help!
The other is on a heavy board backing, and that CAN'T ever be rolled.
Why the two types? The first is used for posters that need little or any restoration. The second is used for ones that need more substantial restoration, and the heavier backing allows for more restoration and the disguising of such restoration.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
I am wondering what you guys think... What would be your preference if two posters one linenbacked and one paper backed were available. Would you pay more for the linenbacked copy?
EMP statement...
Note that this poster has been paperbacked. What is paperbacking? This means the poster was backed onto a paper backing (acid-free), that is similar in feel to that of the original poster (except somewhat heavier). It is a similar process to linenbacking, except that most collectors use linenbacking for one-sheets and paperbacking for half-sheets, inserts, window cards, and lobby cards. Note that because this poster was paperbacked onto a thin paper backing, it can be sent rolled (however, it will be rolled with the image outward, because paperbacked posters should always be rolled that way, while linen posters are always rolled with the image inward), and it will likely need to be sent in a 6" tube, because rolling it more tightly might damage the poster.
I think the dilemma that I face in this question, and possibly others is that if you've never felt a poster that has been paperbacked on Mulberry paper whether it's an insert or half sheet or lobby card then the frame of reference is not there.
And if paper or compound infill or other major restoration is needed does mulberry paper support that as well as linen backing?
Another is a medium weight paper, which some restorers use for half-sheets inserts, and window cards, and it gives a more substantial backing, but when you hold it to a strong light, you can see through it. This can sometimes result in a rollable poster.
The last is a REALLY heavy weight "paper", which is really a heavy board. Some restorers (and dealers and auctions) love this, because you can't see through it with the strongest light, and after they dip the front of the poster in paint (spray painting over ALL the solid areas) you can't tell what was done, and sometimes new collectors think such a poster is in FAR better condition than it really was.
I hate this last method (which is usually used to hide major defects) and when I get a poster like that, I have been saying "There is so much heavy restoration on this poster that it is hard to tell what (or how much) was done.
Incidentally, Charlie, what you quoted above is just one of the paragraphs we put on paperbacked posters. It depends on which method was used.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
You are probably correct in your assumption that most had not handled a paper backed poster.
I also don't think a paper backed poster would act any differently with major restoration than linen. The only concern to me may be that the poster is very similar to the original so if you mishandle it it will bend and link like a regular unbacked poster.
This was going to be my question. Only stuff I have paperpacked are a couple of 40x60 and they would be on midweight paper is my guess.
I dunno, with the fragile early daybills, I would be scared that just paperbacking it, my clumsy self would be more inclined to damage it!
@Charlie- do you trim the excess Mulberry paper to the edge of the daybill? Or leave a small border as one would for linen?
Ok, so the wonderful Charlie paperbacked a daybill for me...my first non cardstock poster on paper that I have ever handled.
I dunno if I like it...it seems more rigid and fragile to me now! I'm clumsy as anything, and I think I would probably damage them more.
I feel like I can be a bit rougher with my linenbacked stuff.
BUT, there is something about the way it looks I really like! Not sure if this is just my poster (its a fugly poster but I love it)...I can't put my finger on it.
They are flattening out now, but will post some pics and more comments later when I can handle them a bit better.
All were of the solid opinion that the proper way to back a poster is with "Japanese Paper" which should then be kept flat. However, discussing the obvious problems of handling and transportation, especially with larger sized posters, all agreed ( some begrudgingly) that linenbacking was acceptable. I can only assume therefore, that the popularity of cotton duck mounting over the last 2 or 3 decades, especially with the auction houses, is purely for those two reasons. The conservators' real objection to linen was the movement over time of two different materials - paper and cotton duck. I did once see a duck-lined 3-sheet that was wrinkled badly - but perhaps it was rolled and unrolled too often or badly done in the first place.
Now - in Australia, I have never been able to find masa, mulberry or any similar type of Japanese paper in rolls wide enough to back a 1-sheet, let alone larger sizes, which is why there's been no backing action from me - that and a certain amount of fear! However, one conservator and one conservation supplier agreed that Archival Barrier Paper would be a perfectly acceptable backing, using starch paste of course. This paper is readily available here in plain white - similar to bond copy paper - but is absolutely acid and lignin free. It comes usually in 80gsm or 120gsm, in 50 or 100 metre rolls, and usually 1-1.3metres wide (40-52in).
So - can anyone tell me where rolls of masa or similar are hiding in Australia? and -
- has anyone tried Barrier Paper backing or know anything further about it?
- also, surely a 1-sheet say, on masa or Barrier Paper could be rolled, but of course not tightly - perhaps in a 100-150mm (4-6in) tube?
Rod