Poster Linen Backing Overkill
in Restoration
I am of the opinion that the linen backing of film posters is not always a wise move to do if one intends to sell at a later time. Linen backing of minor film titles in excellent condition, and where numerous poster numbers of the same title in good to fine condition are commonly available in the marketplace on a regular basis is now happening a lot.
I have a good example of where selling a linen backed Australian daybill film poster ended up in the losing of a sizable of money in having done so. Before I reveal the name of the film poster in question I would like to hear what others think. Is linen backing become an overkill in many cases?
I have a good example of where selling a linen backed Australian daybill film poster ended up in the losing of a sizable of money in having done so. Before I reveal the name of the film poster in question I would like to hear what others think. Is linen backing become an overkill in many cases?
0

Comments
Yet people do it all the time. The only benefit is to the buyer, who often gets a steal, assuming the linenbacking was well done in the first place.
There are a number of linenbackers who should stop what they are doing, due to a lack of skills.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
$195 is too high for a shit job posterfix would do. I would imagine you could get a daybill backed for <$150 in the US with the exception of extensive restoration work.
Fourth Cone has become so popular they are hard to get access to. Dario is pissed off at Americans since they lost the Hockey match. Aussies maybe not so much.
You just want to make some statement/diatribe about how “this one poster was backed that didn’t need it and it sold for less than the value plus cost of backing but if they had kept it original it would have been worth about the same…”
If you had interest in Linenbacking or read any of the threads about restoration “that don’t interest you” but that now do but for no apparent reason - you would know that this happens all the time and this is why many people try to learn Linenbacking DIY I used to back daybills for $5-$10 of cotton duck, $3 worth of masa, and a few bucks for wheat paste and chems and watercolor pencils…
It is not the material cost - it’s the labor. It takes 15 minutes to stretch, 15 min to wash, 15-20 minutes to back and another 30 to touch up a straight forward daybill.
So $15 for materials, 1.5 hours labor plus overhead.
~$110 - $130 cost - add 10% to 12% profit = $150 for a basic $20-$24/hour art school graduate.
This is why Bruce can’t auction anything less than $50 average low item.
It would appear that my simple question regarding linen backing that I asked here has triggered something with you that has upset you. After our earlier problems were such a long time ago, and a thing of the past, and you did leave me alone I have been happy in participating here. Things have now changed, and I don't intend to go through another tit for tat period with you again, which does appear could be on the cards.. Your above comment does seem like it is personal with you.
Hondo – I probably came in a little hot.
My actual frustration is more with the setup than the topic. We’ve covered linen backing pretty heavily over the years, and these threads tend to land in the same place.
Your point isn’t wrong—backing common titles in good condition usually doesn’t make sense. That’s been proven plenty of times.
I just think it’s more helpful to focus on where backing actually adds value, especially for newer collectors. And even though it may not make sense in some cases, linen backing definitely has its place in the hobby.
Not looking to get into another round here—just keeping things on track.
Since in 2026 Bruce has auctioned three more Captain Clegg daybills that were not linen backed and were sold for $69, $67 then $50.
Judging on what Charlie and other people have told me, along with Google sourced information, that with the linen backing cost involved, and only receiving a total of $99 it would certainly appear a substantial loss would have occurred as this wouldn't have covered the original cost of purchasing the poster, plus the substantial linen backing costs involved, especially if professional services had been used. One then has to ask why was this poster of a highly accessible film poster of a minor film ever considered one to be worthy of linen backing.
Agreed, and that has resulted in the prices falling.