A no limit final could also mean the one with the deepest pockets will win.. So it may as well be anything goes.
OK... What limit should we set to keep everyone from feeling like the deep pockets would have it in the final? I don't want to discourage people whom couldn't ultimately compete with 6 $1000+ posters... Maybe put a tapered value on the last four rounds:
In addition to category you can only post four posters with the following limitations:
Value is going to be too hard, what you paid and what I might think it is worth might make it difficult. Let it be about the poster, there are some who hate the BAT and its dot design, so they wouldn't vote for that even if it is worth more than my Pretty Woman (but only just).
I agree that $'s may give some an advantage over others, but IMHO, my Bombay Clipper which cost me about $250 can compete with a North/northwest one sheet at over $750. A tapered pricing structure though, would make the contestants search for suitable posters in each price range-make it more interesting...
Ok looks like there are no more comments... One item I thought about was film year vs. poster year. We shall stick to the year a film first was shown or the widely accepted year (imdb date) for the time period category... So if a film came was first shown in 1960 even though you have an 80s rr that is a 1960s poster.
Are the rules really that complicated. Are the American's the only country that plays tournaments??? My seven year old's softball tourney's are run the same way. Bracket +game rules...
Anyone else want to give me some tips? I keep getting comments about the complexity of the rules.
Comments