I remember when I auctioned this herald. Such striking images!
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Totally guessing, but I am thinking 181 is Panic in the Year Zero, and 183 is the 1978 Invasion of the Body Snatchers
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Totally guessing, but I am thinking 181 is Panic in the Year Zero, and 183 is the 1978 Invasion of the Body Snatchers
Spot on guessing Bruce with both 181 and 183 answered correctly. The 183 image is of the cameo appearance of Kevin McCarthy the star of the 1956 original version of the film.
Panic In Year Zero ( 1962 ) & Invasion Of The Body Snatchers ( 1978 ).
Correct. Project X was one of many films that used this title. This version released in 1968. The film had special sequences animated by Hanna-Barbera and was produced and directed by William Castle.
The previous four images displayed, with and without any clues, were answered promptly. I think this new batch will probably range from being easy and up to difficult to solve.
Is 184 The Tunnel (Transatlantic Tunnel)? It is the only Richard Dix sci-fi I know.
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Is 184 The Tunnel (Transatlantic Tunnel)? It is the only Richard Dix sci-fi I know.
Well picked up Bruce. This Richard Dix film from 1935 as far as I can see was his only sci-fi film. This ambitious British film imported a number of American actors to appear in the film.
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Since I am the only one playing, I will post that #185 is Looker.
I do REALLY well with horror/sci-fi, but REALLY terribly with war movies. They all the look the same to me! I suspect I would be even worse with cowboy movies!
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Since I am the only one playing, I will post that #185 is Looker.
I do REALLY well with horror/sci-fi, but REALLY terribly with war movies. They all the look the same to me! I suspect I would be even worse with cowboy movies!
Correct in that # 185 is Looker ( 1981 ). I really appreciate your participation Bruce with my quizzes on the genres that you obviously know and enjoy.
You are not alone in the subject of Western movies. I introduced a thread titled The Western Quiz in September 2015, and by the end of the same month ceased posting any new entries due to little interest. Pancho commented he wasn't interested in westerns and Ves said she would struggle. Fortuneately the War Movies Quiz I also introduced in September 2015 has been my most viewed and participated in quiz.
Now back to Looker.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Looker is a 1981 American science-fiction film[1] written and directed by Michael Crichton and starring Albert Finney, Susan Dey, and James Coburn.[4] The film is a suspense/science-fiction piece that comments upon and satirizes media, advertising, television's effects on the populace, and a ridiculous standard of beauty.
Though sparse in visual effects, the film is notable for being the first commercial film to attempt to make a computer-generated, three-dimensional, solid-looking model of a whole human body. However, as with its predecessors Futureworld, Star Wars, and Alien, this was an example of "CGI representing CGI", and only depicted on CRT screens in the movie, rather than being used as a special effect. The model had no skeletal or facial movements and was not a character. Looker was also the first film to create three-dimensional (3D) shading with a computer,[5] months before the release of the better-known Tron.
Comments
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
A couple of easy ones, and I am thinking a most likely harder one in the mix as well.
#178 answer correct from Jay. The Invisible Boy from 1957.
# 177 clue is a British film.
# 179 clue is a Japanese film.
#177: 1959
#179 Rodan.
Correct. Titled The Giant Behemoth for the U.S.A. release, with Behemoth The Sea Monster being the original U.K. and Australian title.
theartofmovieposters said:
Correct. Rodan from 1956.
Back again after a two year and eight month absence. This previously popular quiz has another four titles here for you to have a think about.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Spot on guessing Bruce with both 181 and 183 answered correctly. The 183 image is of the cameo appearance of Kevin McCarthy the star of the 1956 original version of the film.
Panic In Year Zero ( 1962 ) & Invasion Of The Body Snatchers ( 1978 ).
Good thinking, but it isn't The Terminal Man from 1974. Concentrate on the previous decade's sci-fi films.
Correct, it is indeed the original 1956 version of Invasion Of The Body Snatchers.
Appearing in the below scene is Sam Peckinpah, the famous film director playing the part of Charlie the meter reader.
In my opinion one of the best sci-fi films ever made. Anyone agree?
Final clue for # 180 is gimmicks.
Correct. Project X was one of many films that used this title. This version released in 1968. The film had special sequences animated by Hanna-Barbera and was produced and directed by William Castle.
186 187
The previous four images displayed, with and without any clues, were answered promptly. I think this new batch will probably range from being easy and up to difficult to solve.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Peter
The original Star Wars U.S. international 6 sheet.
This poster is currently up for sale on eBay for $5,995.00 U.S.
Are you thinking Dede perhaps you should have hung on to it for a while longer?
Peter
Clue for # 185 is sometimes it doesn't pay to be perfect. A bonus clue is some firsts involved with this film.
Clue for # 187 is think of a number.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
I do REALLY well with horror/sci-fi, but REALLY terribly with war movies. They all the look the same to me! I suspect I would be even worse with cowboy movies!
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
You are not alone in the subject of Western movies. I introduced a thread titled The Western Quiz in September 2015, and by the end of the same month ceased posting any new entries due to little interest. Pancho commented he wasn't interested in westerns and Ves said she would struggle. Fortuneately the War Movies Quiz I also introduced in September 2015 has been my most viewed and participated in quiz.
Now back to Looker.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Looker is a 1981 American science-fiction film[1] written and directed by Michael Crichton and starring Albert Finney, Susan Dey, and James Coburn.[4] The film is a suspense/science-fiction piece that comments upon and satirizes media, advertising, television's effects on the populace, and a ridiculous standard of beauty.
Though sparse in visual effects, the film is notable for being the first commercial film to attempt to make a computer-generated, three-dimensional, solid-looking model of a whole human body. However, as with its predecessors Futureworld, Star Wars, and Alien, this was an example of "CGI representing CGI", and only depicted on CRT screens in the movie, rather than being used as a special effect. The model had no skeletal or facial movements and was not a character. Looker was also the first film to create three-dimensional (3D) shading with a computer,[5] months before the release of the better-known Tron.