A guilty pleasure of mine with the pair, the car racing and the songs
Correct, but the year was 1964 of course which is what you were intending to say. I agree 100% with your commrnts and the wonderful Ann Margret was certainly the most exciting actress to appear in a film playiing opposite Elvis.
Correct and La La Land ( 2016 ) is the film that at the 2017 Oscar ceremony was incorrectly named Best Film instead of Moonlight. Emma Stone seen below dancing with Ryan Gosling. I personally thought it was a great film.
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Yes, it is indeed Mariln Monroe as she appeared in the early Cinemascope film River Of No Return from 1954. Apart from Marilyn some magnificent scenery appears in this film.
The first one sure looks like Deborah Kerr from From Here to Eternity.
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Correct and thanks for the article. I noticed it has a major error in the captionIng of one the images though of Sophia.
Incorrectly listed as 6 / 25 Sophia Loren in Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow ( 1963 ). This scene is from The Millionairess ( 1960 ). A major error from French Vogue magazine one would have to think.
I'm thinking pre-code Busby Berkley, possibly Joan Blondell. I looked at images for 42nd street, Golddiggers of 1933, Dames and Footlight parade without seeing that costume.
I'm thinking pre-code Busby Berkley, possibly Joan Blondell. I looked at images for 42nd street, Golddiggers of 1933, Dames and Footlight parade without seeing that costume.
Haven't given up, but out of time today.
You are certainly on the right track with your thinking. I believe that the image is misleading though.The actress appearing in the image may or may not have worn the costume in the film. This image could have been shot during a costume tryout or just from a film shoot arranged for publicity purposes only.
It does happen though that something similar to this costume can be located by searching Google, but is worn by someone else in the film other than the actress depicted here.
Good detective work Jay. 175 is indeed Ruby Keeler and the film being promoted is Dames ( 1934 ), which you had earlier mentioned as being part of the searching process that you had conducted.
Somewhat similar styled outfit to the one Ruby Keeler is pictured wearing, as worn by one of the chorus girls in Dames.
There are currently three people who contribute to this quiz. These participants allow it to continue to survive. The members that contribute are very much appreciated by me. On saying that I really would like to secure some more involvement with other members of the forum if at all possible. For any new members in particular don't be shy and please join in if you know the answers. For regulars though please continue to keep answering as you are the lifeblood here.
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Then how about Linda Harrison in Planet of the Apes?
HAS lifetime guarantees on every item - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Comments
A guilty pleasure of mine with the pair, the car racing and the songs
Correct, but the year was 1964 of course which is what you were intending to say.
# 169 final clue is that the film was adapted from a successful and initially notorious novel.
!70 & 171
There shouldn't be any problems in finding the answers here for these two.
172. On the other hand I would think this one as perhaps being a little more difficult though, but one never knows.
Can only find small images
but IMDB has a 8x10 glossy with a similar, and much better image
Another image of Fay Spain showing a little more that her legs in this scene from the film.
theartofmovieposters said: Correct and La La Land ( 2016 ) is the film that at the 2017 Oscar ceremony was incorrectly named Best Film instead of Moonlight. Emma Stone seen below dancing with Ryan Gosling. I personally thought it was a great film.
171. A clue is a famous pair of legs are certainly featured above.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
173 & 174
Last two entries for a while. Both famous actresses, but one of them usually was cast in more sexier roles that the other throughout their careers.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
The only tie I found to the movie title was on this French Vogue article
https://www.vogue.fr/fashion-culture/galerie/diaporamasophia-loren-in-ten-vintage-shots37151?image=5c360fa951fe631c9620c25a
Incorrectly listed as 6 / 25 Sophia Loren in Yesterday, Today And Tomorrow ( 1963 ). This scene is from The Millionairess ( 1960 ). A major error from French Vogue magazine one would have to think.
175
Classic 1930's ''Golden years of Hollywood'' film musical promotion image. Very nice shapely legs. Any idea of the name of the actress and the film?
Haven't given up, but out of time today.
It does happen though that something similar to this costume can be located by searching Google, but is worn by someone else in the film other than the actress depicted here.
Not sure of the film. She was in all of the ones I mentioned and this image is not tied to any film.
Good detective work Jay. 175 is indeed Ruby Keeler and the film being promoted is Dames ( 1934 ), which you had earlier mentioned as being part of the searching process that you had conducted.
Somewhat similar styled outfit to the one Ruby Keeler is pictured wearing, as worn by one of the chorus girls in Dames.
Four more sets of legs to ponder that I am thinking on the whole shouldn't present too much of a problem in finding an answer for.
Nancy Kwan: The World of Susie Wong (1960)
Correct once more Jay.
There are currently three people who contribute to this quiz. These participants allow it to continue to survive. The members that contribute are very much appreciated by me. On saying that I really would like to secure some more involvement with other members of the forum if at all possible. For any new members in particular don't be shy and please join in if you know the answers. For regulars though please continue to keep answering as you are the lifeblood here.
Clues for -
176 married her boss in real life.
178 is an Academy winning actress.
179 is also an academy awaard winning actress.
Final clue for 176 is that the actress reprised the same role in a sequel.
Final clue for 178 and 179 is that both films definitely share something in common in their titles.
Quando le Donne Avevano la Coda with Senta Berger
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com
Great answer Bruce, but your answer, also titled in English When Women Had Tails ( 1970 ), unfortunately isn't the correct one.
The actress we are looking for is American, but the film comes from around the period your answer is from.
HAS unrestored and unenhanced images - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 100% honest condition descriptions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS auctions where the winner is the higher of two real bidders - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS up to SIXTEEN weeks of "Pay and Hold" to save a fortune on shipping - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS real customer service before, during and after EVERY auction, and answers all questions - IS eMoviePoster.com
HAS 25% or 26% "buyers premiums" of any kind (but especially the dreadful "$29 or $49 minimum" ones) - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "reserves or starts over $1 - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS hidden bidder IDs - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS "nosebleed" shipping charges - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS inadequate packaging - NOT eMoviePoster.com
HAS no customer service to speak of, before, during and after any auction, and answers almost no questions - NOT eMoviePoster.com